As New Year's Eve approaches, the central square of Crimea's largest
city is festooned with bright festive decorations, including a soaring
artificial tree that flashes and winks.
But areas just a few steps away
are sunk in darkness and the street lamps turned off because of an
electricity shortage.
Sevastopol and the rest of Crimea are slowly
recovering from a blackout that hit the Russia-annexed peninsula in
late November when unidentified attackers blew up pylons from mainland
Ukraine that supplied nearly all its electricity.
The blackout
underscored how dependent Crimea remained on Ukraine even after Russia
claimed control of the region in March 2014 following a referendum
sparked by the political chaos in Ukraine, where the Russia-friendly
president fled amid massive protests.
Cheered the blackout
For
about two weeks after the pylon bombing, the peninsula's two million
people were almost entirely without power and critical establishments
such as hospitals relied on their own emergency generators.
Conditions
eased somewhat after Ukraine restored one of the power lines and after
the first of several underwater electricity cables from Russia went into
service. That so-called "energy bridge" had been under development
before the blackout.
While
Ukrainian nationalists and Crimean Tatars who oppose Russian annexation
vengefully cheered the blackout, most of Crimea's people appear to see
it as confirmation they did the right thing by voting to split off from
Ukraine.
"By punishing Crimeans, Ukrainian officials have lost
Crimea and played right into Putin's hands," Andrei Kolesnikov of the
Moscow Carnegie Centre said in a recent article. "By pursuing revenge
against the regime they have hurt ordinary people instead. This will
only make the regime stronger and the besieged fortress will become even
more besieged."
Crimea faces an array of problems, including a
severe decline in tourism, a key piece of its economy. Crimea's tourism
minister, Sergei Strelbitsky, bragged in October that about four million
people had come to the region's beaches and mountains in 2015, but
that's far below the 5.7 to 6 million recorded in the two years
preceding the annexation.
Many residents complain that the region is poorly run. While
local schools and hospitals have received expensive equipment and funds
for refurbishment from Russia in recent months, Moscow's investment in
Crimea is not evident when driving on Crimea's potholed roads or walking
by crumbling building facades.
Economic sanctions
Crimean
governor Sergei Aksyonov complained earlier this month hat Moscow had
not sent "a single kopeck" from the billions it had promised.
Aksyonov
accused the government of seeking too much control over how the
peninsula spends the money. Russian state news agencies in turn quoted
an unnamed government source saying that Moscow had sent about $28m to
Crimea, but that local authorities simply don't know what to do with it.
Foreign
investors fled after the peninsula was slapped with Western economic
sanctions, casting doubt on the region's future. Major Russian companies
including cell phone operators, oil firms and banks closed their
branches in Crimea fearing the backlash of Western sanctions, leaving
the region's banking and telecommunications to obscure private-owned
firms.

No comments:
Post a Comment